The Government Regulations
and
Church Property Part II
In the previous article,
we have covered Property Tax Exemption, Renting to Others, Water/Sewer
Tax Exemption and Building Inspection Fees. We will continue to
our efforts in this second and final portion of the article inattempt
to introduce and cover the basic government regulations and church
property. If you have a specific question or need help, please
contact the Council of Churches of the City of New York by email
at email@cccny.net or by phone at 212-870-1020. We have customized
consulting services available. Let us resume our task of covering
the regulations.
Zoning
and Building Code
...Your property
must meet zoning and building code requirements. Religious organizations,
under court precedents in New York, cannot be zoned out of residential
areas; they can be, and are, precluded from zones designated for
heavy manufacturing because of the potential danger posed to pedestrians
by the heavy truck traffic. The building itself must have a proper
Certificate of Occupancy for its church use. Wood frame homes
cannot lawfully be converted today for church use without very
expensive alterations for fire protection which, generally, makes
this cost prohibitive.
...On the other hand, buildings built
before the 1938 NYC Building Code was adopted were not required
to have Certificates of Occupancy and, assuming no building alterations
since then, are occupied today lawfully without a Certificate
as long as the use (church use, for example) remains unchanged.
Similarly, the 1968 NYC Building Code (the current Code) provided
for the first time that each meeting room within church buildings
must have a Place of Assembly Permit if they can accommodate 75
or more persons. This (1968) requirement for PA Permits also triggers
a requirement that emergency lighting must be installed in each
of those rooms. The Fire Department has been known wrongfully
to issue Code Violations for older church buildings lacking either
a Place of Assembly Permit or emergency lighting. If your building
was used as a church in 1968 and has not been altered since, you
should object and defend yourself against such a Violation. Contact
the Council of Churches for more information if you have previously
been cited for receive such a Violation in the future.
Landmarking Regulations
...In 1965, New
York City created the Landmarks Preservation Commission with authority
to designate individual buildings (and later, in 1971, whole districts)
as “landmarks.” The aura of “landmarking”
exudes thoughts of “honor” and “historic”
and some private organizations are making claims that substantial
funds are available to owners of landmarked buildings for renovation
and restoration purposes. Both the aura and the funding claims
are a false facade masking an intrusive and restrictive set of
regulations. A study in the early 1980s revealed that church buildings
were selected for landmark regulation on average 42 times more
often that all other buildings in the City and that designation
was frequently used as an illegal means of “spot zoning”
to stop a proposed redevelopment of the property.
...Landmark designation – far
from being a benign “honor” – requires that
any alteration of the building be subject to the whim of the Landmark
Preservation Commission which, usually, means a public hearing
where others demand the Commission require the church spend its
mission dollars in ways that do not further its mission. While
the Commission has the authority to designate buildings over the
objections of the owner – and has often done so –
it is worth registering your objection from the beginning.
...Because of many abuses of local
landmarking and zoning ordinances around the nation, Congress
passed the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act
of 2000 which requires that local government agencies demonstrate
that the particular application of the zoning or landmarking ordinance
is to achieve a “compelling state interest” for which
no “less restrictive” means exists. In general, religious
property owners must be given the benefit of the best treatment
which has been afforded to other owners in the jurisdiction.
.............................................................Continue
on Next Page (Click here)
|